Search for: All records

Abstract Cryptic genetic variants exert minimal phenotypic effects alone but are hypothesized to form a vast reservoir of genetic diversity driving trait evolvability through epistatic interactions^1–3. This classical theory has been reinvigorated by pan-genomics, which is revealing pervasive variation within gene families,cis-regulatory regions and regulatory networks^4–6. Testing the ability of cryptic variation to fuel phenotypic diversification has been hindered by intractable genetics, limited allelic diversity and inadequate phenotypic resolution. Here, guided by natural and engineeredcis-regulatory cryptic variants in a paralogous gene pair, we identified additional redundanttransregulators, establishing a regulatory network controlling tomato inflorescence architecture. By combining coding mutations withcis-regulatory alleles in populations segregating for all four network genes, we generated 216 genotypes spanning a wide spectrum of inflorescence complexity and quantified branching in over 35,000 inflorescences. Analysis of this high-resolution genotype–phenotype map using a hierarchical model of epistasis revealed a layer of dose-dependent interactions within paralogue pairs enhancing branching, culminating in strong, synergistic effects. However, we also identified a layer of antagonism between paralogue pairs, whereby accumulating mutations in one pair progressively diminished the effects of mutations in the other. Our results demonstrate how gene regulatory network architecture and complex dosage effects from paralogue diversification converge to shape phenotypic space, producing the potential for both strongly buffered phenotypes and sudden bursts of phenotypic change. 

ABSTRACT Cryptic genetic variants exert minimal or no phenotypic effects alone but have long been hypothesized to form a vast, hidden reservoir of genetic diversity that drives trait evolvability through epistatic interactions. This classical theory has been reinvigorated by pan-genome sequencing, which has revealed pervasive variation within gene families and regulatory networks, including extensive cis-regulatory changes, gene duplication, and divergence between paralogs. Nevertheless, empirical testing of cryptic variation’s capacity to fuel phenotypic diversification has been hindered by intractable genetics, limited allelic diversity, and inadequate phenotypic resolution. Here, guided by natural and engineered cis-regulatory cryptic variants in a recently evolved paralogous gene pair, we identified an additional pair of redundant trans regulators, establishing a regulatory network that controls tomato inflorescence architecture. By combining coding mutations with a cis-regulatory allelic series in populations segregating for all four network genes, we systematically constructed a collection of 216 genotypes spanning the full spectrum of inflorescence complexity and quantified branching in over 27,000 inflorescences. Analysis of the resulting high-resolution genotype-phenotype map revealed a layer of dose-dependent interactions within paralog pairs that enhances branching, culminating in strong, synergistic effects. However, we also uncovered an unexpected layer of antagonism between paralog pairs, where accumulating mutations in one pair progressively diminished the effects of mutations in the other. Our results demonstrate how gene regulatory network architecture and complex dosage effects from paralog diversification converge to shape phenotypic space under a hierarchical model of epistatic interactions. Given the prevalence of paralog evolution in genomes, we propose that paralogous cryptic variation within regulatory networks elicits hierarchies of epistatic interactions, catalyzing bursts of phenotypic change. Keyword:cryptic mutations, paralogs, redundancy, cis-regulatory, tomato, inflorescence, gene regulatory network, modeling, epistasis 

A striking paradox is that genes with conserved protein sequence, function and expression pattern over deep time often exhibit extremely divergentcis-regulatory sequences. It remains unclear how such drasticcis-regulatory evolution across species allows preservation of gene function, and to what extent these differences influence howcis-regulatory variation arising within species impacts phenotypic change. Here, we investigated these questions using a plant stem cell regulator conserved in expression pattern and function over ~125 million years. Usingin-vivogenome editing in two distantly related models,Arabidopsis thaliana(Arabidopsis) andSolanum lycopersicum(tomato), we generated over 70 deletion alleles in the upstream and downstream regions of the stem cell repressor geneCLAVATA3(CLV3) and compared their individual and combined effects on a shared phenotype, the number of carpels that make fruits. We found that sequences upstream of tomatoCLV3are highly sensitive to even small perturbations compared to its downstream region. In contrast, ArabidopsisCLV3function is tolerant to severe disruptions both upstream and downstream of the coding sequence. Combining upstream and downstream deletions also revealed a different regulatory outcome. Whereas phenotypic enhancement from adding downstream mutations was predominantly weak and additive in tomato, mutating both regions of ArabidopsisCLV3caused substantial and synergistic effects, demonstrating distinct distribution and redundancy of functionalcis-regulatory sequences. Our results demonstrate remarkable malleability incis-regulatory structural organization of a deeply conserved plant stem cell regulator and suggest that major reconfiguration ofcis-regulatory sequence space is a common yet cryptic evolutionary force altering genotype-to-phenotype relationships from regulatory variation in conserved genes. Finally, our findings underscore the need for lineage-specific dissection of the spatial architecture ofcis-regulation to effectively engineer trait variation from conserved productivity genes in crops. 

ABSTRACT The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A ‘think tank’ of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help ‘rebrand’ the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.